Television/Movies
and political economy
The political economy of media approach sees
the profit motive that drives corporate media as being incompatible with a
healthy democracy. The media are
extremely critical in the modern society because they are associated with power
whether political or economic. The term media here does not only apply to news,
broadcasting or entertainment on various platforms but to the entire industry.
One such example of the dominant media is the television.
The television does not simply act a tool to
generate revenue by entertaining (movies) or informing (news) the public, but
it is also a central player in strengthening the values of capitalism. It is
unbelievable as to how advertisements, publicities or movies influence public
opinion about certain aspects of routine life, highly contributing to the
formation of beliefs. Being part of the media corporation, the television is
often used as a pawn to shape public opinion in order to pursue political ends.
The media industry did nothing but expand over large areas and it continues to
grow and will continue to grow because money is involved; the primary goal of
corporations is to generate profit for shareholders.
The television industry plays a central
role in the political economy of a country. By using tact of public visibility,
the government tends to use a significant influence upon film-making by helping
to establish the official and informal rubrics under which the cinema operates.
Movies usually diversity the production of its television network and further
propagates its concentration of power over the market showing the link between
political and industrial elites. The cinema can be considered to be an
economic/social institution and a tool for the government, leading to multiple
dimensions. This was possible due to the advent of television. Movies have in a
way become the property/object of the government. The growing attention to the
cinema and the film and media industry is related to both the government and
the private sector. In the end, both need to be winner. The political economy
thus comes into action because quotas are often implemented to protect the
national film cultures from international hits or producers who boom the box
office with blockbusters. For example; the United Kingdom, for instance,
attempted to protect British and British empire filmmakers from Hollywood with
the Cinematograph Films Acts of 1927, 1938, and 1948. Hollywood can be said to
be a major component of most national film cultures where audience expectations
molded largely by Hollywood are misused by domestic producers.
Movies are a form of communication and media
that influence the society are used are used as a gauge of where the mindset of
the population is at. Shortly after USA goes to war with Afghanistan, war
movies came out about fights in Afghanistan and Iraq. After the Americans
killed Gaddafi, videos about making making fun of the dictator came out. When
Americans went into Somalia and “Black hawk” was released and when they
bombarded Serbia, “Dogma” was released. Are these coincidence or simply a
method to control and gauge public support aka propaganda? Movies are sometimes
purely political. The film industry provides cultural fuel and shapes the way
morals and ideals are seen to the general public. It either reinforces
stereotypes or completely shreds them. So many movies have been produced on
political economy amongst which; MALCOLM X, The American President and The
Manchurian Candidate (2004). The television is used in all its aspects to
influence voters directly and indirectly through: movies, advertisements,
news(News coverage debate), publicity(Election campaigns), Also, when the
economic situation is bad, politics play the game carefully; there are
practically no or less movies about wealthy people and spending big. Music
videos also show less gold chain music, for example, little Wayne throwing
money around would just piss people off. The television as a whole or even part
of it such as movies are used as a means by major players who battle over
influence and access to resources to increase the political economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment